- Additional future borrowings increase leverage above 9.5x for a sustained period, without corresponding increases to net revenues;
- Decreased project revenues without corresponding management of expenses or an increase in debt service, resulting in senior lien coverage levels below 1.6x.
Fitch Affirms Miami-Dade County, FL’s Seaport Revs at ‘A’; Outlook Stable
posted by AJOT | Jun 23 2017 at 08:25 AM | Ports & Terminals
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the 'A' rating on Miami-Dade County (the county), Florida's $570 million of outstanding seaport revenue bonds. The revenue bonds are secured by net revenues from the county's seaport department, PortMiami (the port). The Rating Outlook on all bonds is Stable.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
Summary: The rating reflects PortMiami's leading market position evidenced by its ranking as the largest cruise port in the world and one of the largest cargo ports in the state of Florida. The rating also reflects the port's sizeable minimum annual guaranteed revenues (MAGs), which serve to mitigate potential revenue volatility from competition and economic cycles, coupled with adequate total coverage ratios. However, these strengths are moderated by the port's higher than average leverage compared to peers and the potential for sizable future borrowings.
Leading Position, Robust Competition (Revenue Risk - Volume: Midrange): PortMiami, a global secondary port of call in terms of cargo and leading cruise port, benefits from stable revenue streams derived from diversified business lines (with cruise operations and cargo representing approximately 48% and 23% of total revenues respectively). In addition, the port's recently completed Miami Harbor Project which deepened and widened the harbor to accommodate post-panamax ships, added onsite rail and also a truck tunnel that provides direct access between the port and the highway strengthened this market condition and provides additional multimodal capability. Port volumes have some exposure to fluctuations in the cruise business and to the competitive port environment in South Florida and the south eastern seaboard overall.
Guarantees Stabilize Revenues (Revenue Risk - Price: Stronger): The port benefits from long-term guaranteed contracts with key cruise customers and long-term leases with cargo operators, with minimum guarantees covering approximately 77% of fiscal 2016 operating revenues. Minimum guarantees are expected to cover a substantial 70% to 80% of operating revenues in the medium term, which help to insulate revenues and financial metrics from the port's exposure to volume fluctuations.
Manageable Capital Program (Infrastructure and Renewal Risk: Midrange): The port completed its sizable $1 billion Miami Harbor Project in 2015. A primary focus of the CIP was completion of the deep draft shipping channel to allow larger, post-Panamax ships access to the port, which opened for operation in September 2015. The port's current CIP through fiscal 2021 (year-end Sept. 30) is budgeted at a more manageable level and approximately 60% of the forward CIP is expected to be debt funded, with the remainder to come from grants and tenant contributions.
Variable Rate Exposure, Strong Covenants (Debt Structure: Midrange): The revenue bonds are fully amortizing, senior lien debt, supported by very strong structural features such as a MADS based rate covenant and additional bonds test. However, these strengths are tempered by the port's potential exposure to debt interest exposure over time with approximately 30% of outstanding senior lien debt unhedged variable rate bonds and the port's potential sizable debt issuance to support its capital plan. The port is also responsible for payments on the county's seaport general obligation (GO) bonds, which are on parity with the revenue bonds, and the subordinate sunshine state loan payable and capital asset acquisition bonds. While all debt is expected to be repaid by the port's net revenues, all debt besides the seaport revenue bonds are issued through the county and are non-recourse to the port.
Moderate Financial Profile: The port's financial profile has historically generated robust coverage levels above 3.0x for revenue bonds and 1.6x or higher for revenue and GO bonds combined. However, given the port's escalating debt service profile, coverage levels have softened somewhat in fiscal years 2015 and 2016 but still remain supportive of the rating category, with a revenue bond debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) of 2.5x and combined revenue bond and GO DSCR of 1.9x. Leverage is somewhat high at 7.1x for revenue and GO bonds, though these levels may continue to rise given the port's plans for additional debt.
Peers: Comparable ports include other Florida ports such as Port Everglades ('A'/Outlook Positive) and Canaveral Port Authority ('A'/Outlook Stable), which serve similar markets and compete with Miami for cargo and cruise business. PortMiami maintains the largest market share of cruise passengers between the three, while PortMiami and Port Everglades are relatively evenly matched in regards to TEU volumes. PortMiami's leverage is relatively high compared to peers, but leverage is expected to migrate towards levels seen at other Florida ports within five years, not including PortMiami's additional bond issuance. With anticipated additional debt issuances, PortMiami's leverage will remain at its current level, if not migrate upwards. However, the port is able to shoulder a larger debt profile at this rating level, compared to peers, given its size and market cache.
RATING SENSITIVITIES
Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action: