PMSA Criticizes LA/LB Clean Air Action Plan

The Pacific Merchant Shipping Association (PMSA) criticized a new proposed “Clean Air Action Plan (CAAP)” by the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach stating it proposes costly initiatives that will further erode the competitiveness of the two ports. In a September 18th letter, PMSA noted: “Over the past decade, diesel particulate matter emissions are down an incredible 87%. Even more astonishing, DPM (Diesel Particulate matter) is down 96% for trucks and cargo-handling equipment, the primary focus of this Clean Air Action Plan Update. This leaves 4% of remaining emissions that the CAAP Update proposes to reduce at a cost of $14 billion; a cost that undoubtedly understates the true costs of the CAAP and a cost that puts at risk the 1 in 9 jobs in the region that have made the San Pedro Bay ports the economic engine of Southern California.” The letter signed by PMSA Vice-President Thomas Jelenić says the two ports are making insufficient effort to shore up a declining U.S. container market share that dropped from 35.5% in 2006 to 32% in 2016, according to American Association of Port Authority data: “PMSA requests again, given this lack of growth, that before this update to the CAAP is finalized, that staff analyzes the draft for its impact on competitiveness. In addition, the ports should develop a competitiveness goal, and integrate the goal into the CAAP to improve the ability of this gateway to attract and retain cargo.” Asked to comment about PMSA’s letter, Heather Tomley, director of environmental planning at the Port of Long Beach said: “We’ve solicited and received comments from a wide range of our stakeholders on the Draft Clean Air Action Plan. We are reviewing and will take the comments into consideration as we finalize the Plan, which will be considered by our Boards this November. We remain committed to building on the successes of the CAAP, protecting public health and the environment as we grow trade and jobs.” Chris Cannon, director of environmental management at the Port of Los Angeles also responded saying: “We don’t comment on the CAAP responses, other than to say we have been in regular dialogue with them about their CAAP concerns.  We take them very seriously, and will consider them carefully as we prepare the final CAAP document.” PMSA is critical of the CAAP for pursuing a goal of zero-emissions by electrification: “The CAAP seems focused on driving a single technology outcome: zero-emissions by electrification. This is a mandate that is not necessary to achieve the ports’, regions’, or State’s air emission reduction goals.” PMSA also said the Ports’ Green House Gas reduction goals were excessive: “As we have already stated, PMSA is concerned that the CAAP seeks to reduce GHG emissions from CHE by 100% by 2030; this is inconsistent with the state’s 80% by 2050 GHG reduction goal and far beyond what is contemplated in the state’s Sustainable Freight Action Plan.” PMSA said that the Ports have underestimated the costs of converting cargo-handling equipment (CHE) to electrification: “We remain disappointed that the analysis of costs to electrify CHE is based on unfounded assumptions that significantly underestimate total costs.”