International Trade

Foreign-Trade Zones can mitigate high US tariffs & create new economic development

The advent of higher tariffs under the Trump administration is prompting US importers and manufacturers to mitigate higher costs through Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZs), according to Trey Boring, President of IMS Worldwide.

Boring spoke at the Intermodal Association of North America (IANA) Expo 2026 in Long Beach, California, on September 15.

Boring explained the concept:

“And recently, with the advent of a lot of the newer duty rates, what we do have now is a broader spectrum of companies needing foreign-trade zones. So, those of us in the service-provider realm—if you’re a freight forwarder, if you’re somebody that moves containers for people—this has become a bigger deal because more and more companies are now pushing FTZs into their supply chain … What an FTZ … basically allows us to establish is an area like a bonded warehouse, except one that is a little more free and open to run like a business.”

The structure of the FTZ is overseen by the US Department of Commerce:

“The staff for that FTZ Board is housed within the Department of Commerce. That is where you file applications. It is controlled and run locally by Customs and Border Protection, just like they do any other bonded program. They make sure we’re moving freight securely, we … properly account for it, we’ve got our documents filled out and filed. The FTZ allows us to manage or mitigate our duty liability, the tariffs we pay … when we pay it. It’s not an elimination program … If we bring things in, we re-export them … You still have to pay those duties, but at different varying levels, but you get to manage when you do. And that’s really what the program is all about.”

Boring said small ports can help establish new FTZ service areas within their counties to facilitate FTZ growth:

“A small port can establish an … area in the county and designate this: ‘This is my service area.’ And within my service area, any company can apply for a foreign-trade zone at any place in the county. That would support an expedited FTZ application.”

As a result, the cost of capital to produce a product can be reduced, and this can enhance cash flow. Boring said the Trump administration is also favorably disposed toward FTZs being used to support manufacturing in the United States, so this status could enhance US approvals.

The result can be increased profitability:

“Let’s say it’s going to take me $150,000 just in sunk costs upfront to get one approved. Once it’s approved, it’s going to cost me $200,000 a year to run it: software costs, different things, whatever, personnel. You have to have compliance now … What if my gross savings through deferral and exemptions and exports and all this—if my total savings is $1 million a year? Then I don’t have to talk you into doing that.”

Stas Margaronis
Stas Margaronis

Ports & Maritime Editor

Contact Author

Stas Margaronis is a maritime journalist, publisher, and trade industry expert with more than 40 years of experience covering global transportation, ports, logistics, and infrastructure. He serves as California Ports Reporter for the American Journal of Transportation (AJOT), reporting on maritime trade, tariffs, and port developments across California’s major seaports. Margaronis is also President of the Propeller Club of Northern California and publisher of Rebuild the United States (RBTUS), covering infrastructure, shipbuilding, cybersecurity, AI, and national security. His background includes international trade, logistics management, and publishing, with experience spanning the United States and Asia.

© Copyright 1999–2026 American Journal of Transportation. All Rights Reserved