We don’t dump steel, says Turkish exporter

By: | Issue #641 | at 02:55 PM | Channel(s): Maritime  Breakbulk  

Turkish steel exporters complain that the United States has deployed protective measures against imported steel and that it has become more active in these areas in recent years. The new Trump administration is likely to be more protectionist than its predecessors, which may be one reason that Namik Ekinci, chairman of the Turkish Steel Exporters’ Association, is speaking out at this time.

Another reason is that the U.S. has broadened its attack against Turkish steel imports since 2013.

Trade cases were limited to standard pipes and light-walled rectangular pipe and tube until 2013. Since then eleven anti-dumping and countervailing duty investigations have been initiated against Turkish OCTG, rebar, welded line pipe, steel nails, heavy walled rectangular welded pipes and tubes, hot-rolled steel flat products, and cut-to-length plate products.

The Steel Exporter’s Association is a business association of nearly one-thousand producer and exporter companies in the Turkish steel industry. Turkey is the world’s tenth largest exporter and ninth largest producer of steel and trade with 200 countries around the world.

To be clear, Ekinci absolutely denies that Turkish steel producers are behaving in an unlawful fashion. As far as he is concerned, no case brought by the U.S. for anti-dumping and/or countervailing duties is ever justified.

“It is totally understandable that the U.S. lodges trade cases to protect its market and industry against dumped and subsidized imports,” Ekinci said. “However, the Turkish steel industry is composed of private companies that are in no way subsidized by the government.” In other words, the Turkish industry doesn’t sell at a loss and claims to the contrary are not supported by the facts. Ekinci allows, however, that Turkish producers “use imported input in production and export on low profit margins.”

In one countervailing duty investigation against Turkey in 2013, the U.S., according to Ekinci, concluded that a publicly-held private steel company from Turkey was a “public body.” But a Canadian trade case against the same product found no evidence that the company had a public connection.

Several cases lodged against Turkish rebar resulted in zero dumping margin and zero or very small subsidy margins. In other words, the investigation found no evidence of substantial subsidies or other unlawful activity. The fact that cases are repeatedly brought against the same product leads Ekinci to conclude that the “trade cases are lodged under the political pressure exerted by domestic producers.”

Log in or Join AJOT to read the complete article

If you are not a premium subscriber, you can get access to AJOT Premium online content for only $59.95 per year!

Did you forget your password?

It happens...

Peter Buxbaum's avatar

American Journal of Transportation

More on Peter Buxbaum

Peter Buxbaum has been writing about international trade and transportation, as well as security, defense, technology, and foreign policy, for over 20 years. Besides contributing to the AJOT, Buxbaum's work has appeared in such leading publications as Fortune, Forbes, Chief Executive, Computerworld, and Jane's Defence Weekly. He was educated at Columbia University.