Well, in 2022 China built the lion’s share of large oceangoing vessels according to a report by the Barry Rogriano Salis (BRS) Group. China built 121.3 million deadweight tons (DWT) of ships based on its order book at the end of 2022 up from 111 million DWT in 2021. And as a result, China’s share of the global market rose from 47.7% to 50.3%.
South Korea, a distant second in the global shipbuilding sweepstakes, built ships of 69.8 million DWT in 2022, up from 68.3 million DWT in 2021, but its market share inched down from 29.6% to 29.0%, according to a November report by Business Korea. And in the number three slot was Japan. Japan’s order intake shrank from 47.7 million DWT in 2021 to 36.5 million DWT last year, and its market share fell from 17.6% to 15.1%.
So where was the greatest industrial power on the planet, the United States, in the commercial shipbuilding ranks? The US market share was a measly 0.2%.
It is no surprise the U.S. Congressional Research Service (CRS) cited the data and noted that 90% of military equipment needed for overseas wars is transported by cargo ships and expressed a concern about the United States lack of competitiveness and the possible negative impact on America’s national security. But this is nothing new as this situation has existed for decades.
It wasn’t always so.
Before the United States allowed its shipping industry and shipbuilding to decline, the United States pioneered shipbuilding mass-production during World War II.
During the period of 1939-1945, 5,777 ships including the Liberty ships, Victory ships, tankers, and military ships were constructed at U.S. shipyards.
The shipbuilding program produced a Liberty ship that could transport 10,800 deadweight tons (the weight of cargo a ship can carry). In total, the 2,708 Liberty ships that were built collectively generated the capacity to transport 29,246,400 tons of weapons, food and supplies to European and Asian military theaters that helped win World War II.
The shipbuilding program employed 650,900 American workers. African Americans and women were employed by the shipyards in large numbers and the shipbuilding employment boom helped pull the United States out of the Great Depression financed by federally financed war orders.
It may be time to review that success and why it may be relevant in 2024.
The centerpiece of the U.S. shipbuilding success was the construction of 2,708 Liberty ships that were primarily built between 1942 and 1945. According to the Smithsonian, the first ships required about 230 days to build while the average construction time eventually dropped to 42 days, with three new ships being launched each day in 1943.
According to the publication Professional Mariner, the need for vessels to transport war materiel was so urgent that corners had to be cut in their design: “The underpowered Libertys were very slow. They cruised at only 11 knots, making them easy targets for both German and Japanese submarine and air attacks. But without the Liberty ships, the Allies could not have won the war.” The Liberty ships were succeeded by Victory ships which addressed some of the concerns, along with T1 and T2 tankers that supplied vast amounts of fuel to the wartime effort.
The mass-production success was due in large part to the ability of the U.S. Maritime Commission (today the U.S. Maritime Administration - MARAD) to mobilize new and existing shipyards to support the mass production of ships.
In his seminal book, “Ships for Victory: A History of U.S. Shipbuilding under the U.S. Maritime Commission in World War II”, Frederic C. Lane in a nearly 900-page history detailed how new and existing shipyards were mobilized to mass produce the ships that helped win World War II.
The shipbuilding effort was one of the most outstanding achievements of President Franklin Roosevelt’s Administration and a stunning display of industrialization that helped reverse the tide of the war.
The U.S. shipbuilding effort was directed by Admiral Emery Land, Chairman of the U.S. Maritime Commission and by Vice Chairman and Vice Admiral Howard Vickery. Land had a long-standing relationship with Roosevelt dating back to World War I. Land was also instrumental in overseeing the establishment of the United States Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point, New York.
Lane describes how new and innovative shipbuilding methods were deployed, thanks in part to new shipbuilders that included the Kaiser and Bechtel construction companies.
Both Henry Kaiser and Warren Bechtel had previously worked together on the mammoth Hoover Dam project that helped bring electrification to America’s Southwestern states. The construction of the Hoover Dam required temporarily re-directing the Colorado River. The river diversion around the dam site was constructed “through four 50-foot-diameter tunnels, two drilled through the canyon walls on each side of the river.” Both men were hardened to handling heavy pressure and delivering through innovation…and the mass production was the innovation needed for shipbuilding to address the wartime demands.
As mass production took hold in the shipbuilding industry, Henry Kaiser soon emerged as one of the leaders in the mass-production effort, possibly because he was not a traditional shipbuilder and approached the problem with a fresh perspective. Kaiser built new shipyards in California, Oregon and Washington and revolutionized the shipbuilding process as a 2007 Professional Mariner report noted: “In their (Kaiser) shipyards, bow units, stern units, deckhouses and other major sub-sections were pre-assembled and then welded together to form the ship. This approach resulted in ever-shorter delivery times.”
In his Ships for Victory history, Lane describes important developments that aided mass-produced shipbuilding:
Not surprisingly, the mass production of ships also led to ships being launched with many defects. Some of the more obvious errors were ladders and stairs to no place. Or conversely, hatches with no connecting ladders. But there were other more serious defects as a 2007 issue of Professional Mariner, pointed out: “A series of structural failures occurred with these newly welded ships that became major problems. Some of the failures were the result of defective welds. In other cases, the structural failure was the result of inappropriate uses of welding. The hulls of several ships split apart in Arctic waters. It was found that the Arctic cold makes ordinary mild steel very brittle.”
The success of the U.S. shipbuilding mobilization resulted in American shipbuilding innovations and methods being replicated in Japan, Korea, and China.
Unfortunately, the US allowed its maritime and shipbuilding industries to decline by not investing in modern shipbuilding technologies and methods. It became economically imperative to rely on foreign built ships and shipping.
But the US is entering an era of opportunity with offshore wind power to revitalize the maritime infrastructure of the country, as the University of Maine’s Dr. Habib Dagher, a first rank marine engineering innovator, remarked in an interview with the American Journal of Transportation, to create a new Marshall Plan for ports and maritime industries.
To that goal, U.S. policy makers might benefit from a reading of Ships for Victory so as to discover how there might be a value in a revived U.S. shipbuilding industry and how the lessons of 1941-1945 might be worth relearning in 2024.
© Copyright 1999–2024 American Journal of Transportation. All Rights Reserved